Deployment brief
- Customer situation and target decision
- Current workflow and stakeholders
- Constraints, assumptions, risks, and success measures
Complete a realistic deployment, submit inspectable evidence, defend your decisions before a reviewer, and earn a public credential only when your work meets the published standard.
The candidate can move from an ambiguous operational problem to a working, deployable, adopted, and measurable technical solution.
Issued independently by Deploy to Value. It is not an academic degree, government license, accredited professional certification, or guarantee of employment. The public record states exactly what was assessed.
Candidates submit one substantial official mission or an approved real-world project with confidential information removed.
Payment purchases assessment, review, and feedback. It does not guarantee issuance of the credential.
Provide identity, background, portfolio links, selected mission, and accommodation needs.
Get the assessment version, evidence checklist, submission deadline, and candidate ID.
Provide repository, deployment, documents, diagram, demonstration, and disclosures.
Review access, setup, required files, exposed secrets, originality, and core functionality.
Reviewer records evidence and scores every published rubric category.
Demonstrate the system, explain tradeoffs, and respond to a newly introduced constraint.
Pass, conditional pass, revision required, or not yet competent—with written feedback.
Publish the verification record, badge, certificate, issue date, validity, and assessed competencies.
The 30–45 minute review tests reasoning that cannot be reliably demonstrated through a polished repository alone.
“What would you remove if delivery had to happen one week earlier?”
“What happens when the primary data source fails?”
“Why build this instead of changing the workflow?”
“What evidence would cause you to stop?”
Every active credential has a unique ID and a public verification page showing the assessed standard without exposing private candidate materials.
Private files, email addresses, recordings, reviewer notes, and confidential evidence are not published.
The assessment policies are published before candidates pay or submit work.
At least 75/100 overall, at least 50% in every category, working core functionality, successful defense, and no critical integrity, safety, or security failure.
Open the rubric →AI tools are permitted. Candidates remain responsible for correctness, security, originality, and explanation. Material assistance must be disclosed.
Decisions may include one bounded revision opportunity. Appeals address procedural or scoring errors, not simple disagreement with the standard.
Read all policies →The credential is valid for two years. Renewal requires current evidence of deployment practice—not payment alone.
Reviewers disclose relationships and recuse themselves where impartiality could reasonably be questioned.
Credentials may be suspended or revoked for material fraud, identity misrepresentation, plagiarism, or later-discovered integrity violations.
The initial pilot should use one credential, one official mission, one published rubric, one live defense, one revision opportunity, and a two-year validity period.